U.S. proposal to strike Syrian installations border and Hezbollah from the Lebanese government
In an article dealing with dealing with the U.S. Hezbollah, published by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a while ago, the writer refers Ashe Jin, a former member of the Planning Group Policy and the State Department, noted that since the war ended in 2006, the United States sought to counter Hezbollah's progress on three main axes:
First: continued to support the March 14 coalition, which opposes the current status of Hezbollah as an armed militia.
Second: has spent large sums of money to strengthen the capacity of the Lebanese government's pro-Western from 2006, through allocation of more than 600 million dollars in security assistance, in addition to 500 million dollars in aid for civilian programs.
III: enhanced international efforts to tarnish the image of Hezbollah and restricting its financial activities across the world.
The article in this area that efforts in these three points in June 2009 resulted in a failure of the opposing line for the March 14 coalition to get majority of seats in parliamentary elections.
However, the same article points out that the victory of the parliamentary group backed by the United States has not been translated curtailed political power to Hezbollah, but on the contrary, the Alliance is the March 14 rupture.
Accordingly, the article points to the emergence of American Voices are calling for a new approach with Hezbollah, the first of the Deputy U.S. National Security Adviser John Brennan, who called to communicate with certain elements of Hezbollah, that could lead to moderation of the group ideology.
The article says: According to media reports, recently leaked a calendar for the "Red Team" of the "U.S. Central Command," a similar line of thinking.
However, the author of the article which publicized his opposition to the growth of the new approach, building its position on the issue of the international tribunal for Lebanon, he says: "If ratified by the doubts about the rule of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon to hand the involvement of Hezbollah in the Hariri assassination, it will show that the party does not fear the transfer of skills, skilled in deadly assassinations against political opponents locals.
The article says: would not abuse the new American in this case only to the ratification of the growing capabilities of the organization, and enhancement of the legitimacy of local and international, will also increase to undermining what remains of the democratically elected government and pro-Western government in Beirut, and on a wider scale, will indicate such a substantial transformation in politics, the decline in the U.S. to face terrorism.
Based on all the above, concludes the article to put a firmer approach with Hezbollah is as follows:
First: to increase the pressure on Syria and Iran, as the United States should launch a campaign to impose UN sanctions on Syria for its apparent violations of Security Council resolution 1701, in addition to trauma sanctions on Iran for its violation of Resolution 1747 on the prohibition of arms transfers.The establishment of such a campaign would also help to legitimize the possible air strikes against Syrian installations along the Lebanese border if the transfer of weapons to Hezbollah.
Second: defining the role of Hezbollah in the government, as should U.S. officials to discuss their allies in Lebanon and the region in relation to the terms of the continued participation of Hezbollah in the government of national unity.
III: strengthening independent Shiite, and enhance their ability to form alternative political movement.
Fourth, strengthen coordination with allies, especially Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, laying the groundwork for a joint diplomatic in the event of conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.
In an article dealing with dealing with the U.S. Hezbollah, published by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a while ago, the writer refers Ashe Jin, a former member of the Planning Group Policy and the State Department, noted that since the war ended in 2006, the United States sought to counter Hezbollah's progress on three main axes:
First: continued to support the March 14 coalition, which opposes the current status of Hezbollah as an armed militia.
Second: has spent large sums of money to strengthen the capacity of the Lebanese government's pro-Western from 2006, through allocation of more than 600 million dollars in security assistance, in addition to 500 million dollars in aid for civilian programs.
III: enhanced international efforts to tarnish the image of Hezbollah and restricting its financial activities across the world.
The article in this area that efforts in these three points in June 2009 resulted in a failure of the opposing line for the March 14 coalition to get majority of seats in parliamentary elections.
However, the same article points out that the victory of the parliamentary group backed by the United States has not been translated curtailed political power to Hezbollah, but on the contrary, the Alliance is the March 14 rupture.
Accordingly, the article points to the emergence of American Voices are calling for a new approach with Hezbollah, the first of the Deputy U.S. National Security Adviser John Brennan, who called to communicate with certain elements of Hezbollah, that could lead to moderation of the group ideology.
The article says: According to media reports, recently leaked a calendar for the "Red Team" of the "U.S. Central Command," a similar line of thinking.
However, the author of the article which publicized his opposition to the growth of the new approach, building its position on the issue of the international tribunal for Lebanon, he says: "If ratified by the doubts about the rule of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon to hand the involvement of Hezbollah in the Hariri assassination, it will show that the party does not fear the transfer of skills, skilled in deadly assassinations against political opponents locals.
The article says: would not abuse the new American in this case only to the ratification of the growing capabilities of the organization, and enhancement of the legitimacy of local and international, will also increase to undermining what remains of the democratically elected government and pro-Western government in Beirut, and on a wider scale, will indicate such a substantial transformation in politics, the decline in the U.S. to face terrorism.
Based on all the above, concludes the article to put a firmer approach with Hezbollah is as follows:
First: to increase the pressure on Syria and Iran, as the United States should launch a campaign to impose UN sanctions on Syria for its apparent violations of Security Council resolution 1701, in addition to trauma sanctions on Iran for its violation of Resolution 1747 on the prohibition of arms transfers.The establishment of such a campaign would also help to legitimize the possible air strikes against Syrian installations along the Lebanese border if the transfer of weapons to Hezbollah.
Second: defining the role of Hezbollah in the government, as should U.S. officials to discuss their allies in Lebanon and the region in relation to the terms of the continued participation of Hezbollah in the government of national unity.
III: strengthening independent Shiite, and enhance their ability to form alternative political movement.
Fourth, strengthen coordination with allies, especially Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, laying the groundwork for a joint diplomatic in the event of conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق